1. INTRODUCTION
In the era of logistics and global supply chains, the quickly and efficient movement of goods is an economic imperative. Investments are at present being deployed to modernize and expand ports and intermodal facilities in order to accommodate growing cargo volumes. Growing ship visitors and machineries in ports will add to local air top quality troubles and global climate alter risks unless ship and machineries emissions are further controlled [172]. Air pollution from shipping activities is a growing difficulty that is drawing increased attention around the world. Local and regional air top quality difficulties linked with ship and machineries gaseous emissions are a concern since of their public health impacts. Exposure to air pollution is linked to a host of wellness risks which includes premature death, cancer, heart and respiratory diseases.
Air pollutant emissions in port presently stay unregulated. The inventories of air pollutants have usually been created on a port mainly for general administrative purposes and public details. Systematic data published for the use of the scientific community is rather scarce [4, 9] Therefore this study attempts to investigate the emissions of gaseous and particulate pollutants in Johor Port.
This paper discusses the emission sources and estimation of concentration of SO2, NO2, CO, CO2 and PM10 from marine source categories in Johor Port. The paper also discuss the compilation of air emission inventory of for Johor Port Area
Air pollutants sources are from two predominantly varieties of pollutants: i. primary pollutants and ii. secondary pollutants. The primary pollutants or emission involve points form normally supply the greatest contribution to overall emissions. The secondary pollutants or emissions sources are not as obvious as the main pollutant emission sources which certainly act as emitters of air pollutants. Secondary pollutant sources are greater insignificant but not as substantial as primary pollutants sources [2, five].
Sources of air pollutants in ports are from mobile sources. Mobile sources is a term used to describe a wide variety of vehicles, engines and equipment that generate air pollution and that move from place to place. These mobile sources are divided into on-road and non-road sources. On-road can be described as licensed motor vehicles, including automobiles, trucks, buses and motorcycles but as for non-road, it can be described as 2- or 4-stroke and diesel engines, non-road vehicles, aircraft, marine vessels and locomotives. Air pollutants from both on-road and non-road sources can come from gasoline or diesel fuels [6,11 12]].
Port emissions are generated by marine vessels and by land-based sources at ports. Marine emissions come primarily from diesel engines operating on ocean going vessels, harbour vessels, dredges and other vessels operating within a port region (Ang and Olson, 2004). Emissions of gaseous and particulates contribute significantly to the total emissions from the transportation sector [five, 6]. Key compounds emitted from the shipping sector are sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon oxides (CO, CO2), particulate matters (PM) (Eyring et al., 2007). Usually, there are two types of engines on a ship: the main engines propel the vessel even though navigating and manoeuvring arre powered by the auxiliary engines that supply electricity for other functions [7, 9].
three. Data acquisition process
The monitoring of emission parameters of pollutant such as sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon oxides (CO, CO2) was conducted employing Gray Wolf Direct Sense TOX PPC Kit and TSI-IAQ Calc equipment. Particulate matter contributes much less than 10 μm (PM10) was monitored making use of Mini Vol Portable Air Sampler. The frequency of sampling was carried out as soon as a month and it is conducted until three sets of information are collected. 3 sampling points had been chosen on every port. The criteria of sampling points contemplate the emissions from vessels, is placed as near as doable to the vessels emissions sources in port region and lastly the sampling points that were chosen are installation are created on the on the pier/wharf/dock.
For ocean going vessel, emission distinct quantification, the emissions estimation methodology can be graphically broken down into actions which are used to estimate the ocean-going vessel emissions which can be use to compile air emission inventory (see Figure three). Survey data is supplied by Johor Port authority according to what are the details required for this study and the technical literature consist of emission elements, load elements and fuel correction elements follows United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA, 1999) and Entec 2007.
five.0 Conclusions
Based on the study conducted, several conclusions can be produced as follows:-
The Johor Port ocean-going vessels emission inventory shows that manoeuvring mode contributes NOx(60%), VOC(2%), CO(5%), SO2(27%), PM10(three%) and PM2.five(3%) while hotelling mode contributes NOx(60%), VOC(2%), CO(four%), SO2(28%), PM10(3%) and PM2.5(three%). NOx emissions from OGVs are comparatively high since most marine engines operate at high temperature and pressures without effective reduction technologies. Besides, SO2 emissions are high since of the high average sulphur content (2.five%) of marine fuels used by most OGVs inside Johor Port boundaries. Given uncertainties in all emissions inventories, the greatest estimate for carbon dioxide (CO2) of the base year of 2007-2008 in Johor Port, is inside the bounded range of 500,000-750,000 kilo tons per year (kT yr-1).
four. Outcomes and Discussions
Below are the marine air emission quantification studies, the study of air pollutants concentration in Johor Port which is compared with Recommended Malaysian Air Top quality Guidelines (RMAQG). The result of emission estimation for every pollutant in Johor Port region from port activities source are presented.
4.1 Air Pollutants Concentration in Johor Port
Based on the study of air pollutants concentration in Johor Port, RMAQG was used in this study for standards comparison purposes. As for gaseous concentration (SO2, NO2, CO, CO2) one hour averaging time was used although for particulate (PM10) 24 hour averaging time are employed.
From this table, it is observed that the highest NO2 detected in sampling station 2 with a concentration of .18 ppm exceeding the RMAQG limits of .17 ppm by 5.9 percent whilst other gaseous at station 1, 2 and 3 are still inside the RMAQG limits. Basically, the limits of NO2 at station 2 exceeded due to heavy operation (cargo loading and unloading) throughout the sampling function.
four.2 Emissions Inventory
The 2007 and 2008 emissions for Johor Port are summarized in this section. Emissions estimate for every pollutant are presented by mode which is at ‘manoeuvring’ and ‘hotelling’.
Based on the inventory presented above, manoeuvring mode emits much less emission than hotelling mode due to the activity period. For vessel manoeuvring in Johor Port, the average duration for manoeuvring period (inbound and outbound) are four hours while what makes hotelling emits higher emission are due to the average hotelling period of 9.6 hours which are used in computing the inventory which is far longer than the manoeuvring mode period.
Major reduction in the number of vessel are due to economic downturn beginning in mid 2008 which affect the organization of shipping worldwide and the numbers of vessels are closely related to the amount of emission that are emitted. They are indirectly, have an effect on the amount of emission sources from seaport that are emitted inside port region as shown in Table 2 and three. The decreasing of seaport total emission by approximately 10 percent in the year 2008 is influenced by the reason stated above and does not relate to any emissions reduction approach. Perhaps, the amount of emission will continue to grow when the economy starts to improve if none reduction approach are becoming regarded as.
Emission sources concentration of sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon oxides (CO, CO2) and particulate matter contribute less than 10 μm (PM10) in port were obtained. From the outcomes obtained and based on the comparison with Recommended Malaysian Air Quality Guidelines (RMAQG), NO2 concentration surprisingly exceed the limit by 5.9 percent in sampling station 2 even though other gaseous at station 1, and 3 are still within the suggested guidelines. The results clearly shows that main pollutants contributor in Johor Port are oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and sulphur dioxide (SO2) with a percentage value of 60 and 28 percent for ship hostelling and manoeuvring mode. Other pollutants contribute are below than 10 percent for both modes.
Based on the results obtained from sampling, it can be seen that NO2 produce some high values of concentration even though two from station 1 and 3 are still below the limits. There is concern about this. As for station 2, the NO2 values exceeds the limits primarily are caused by pack vessels in operation is high NO2 values had been recorded in the course of sampling work, throughout cargo loading and unloading heavy operation period. Apart from that, gaseous emission like SO2 and CO has extremely low concentration values low emission. The greatest factor causing such value is due to the fact of strong wind which depletes the concentration abruptly. Besides, the equipment used are not quite sensitive to gaseous substance throughout outdoor sampling. Theoretically, SO2 and CO should be at particular value when there is an emission. As for particulates and carbon dioxide, the value recorded does not differ as significantly and the particulates are well below the limits of 24-hour averaging time when compared to RMAQG.
REFERENCES
[1] Ang, J. and Olson (2004). Port Emission Inventories and Modelling of Port Emissions for Use in State Implementation Plans (SIPs). White Paper No. 3.
[2] Bradstreet, J. W. (2004). Handbook of Hazardous Air Pollutants. Crest Publishing House.
[three] Corbett, J. J. and Fishbeck, P. S. (1997). Ship Air Emissions: Estimation and Regulation. Science, Vol. 278, No. 5339, Pg 823-824.
[four] Corbett, J. J., Wang, C., Winebrake, J. J. and Green, E. (2007). Allocation and Forecasting of Global Ship Emissions. Clean Air Task Force.
[five] Corbett, J. J. (2004). Verification of Ship Emission Estimates with Monitoring Measurements to Improve Inventory and Modelling. California Air Resources Board and California Environmental Protection Agency.
[6] Dong, C., Huang, K. L., Chen, C. W., Lee, C. W., Lin, H. Y. and Chen, C. F. (2002). Estimation of Air Pollutants Emission from Ships in the Kaohsiung Harbor Region. AAQR-2002-03.
[7] Eyring, V., Corbett, J. J., Lee, D. S. and Winebrake, J. J. (2007). Brief summary of the impact of ship emissions on atmospheric composition, climate and human health. International Maritime Organization.
[8] Entec UK Limited (2007). Ship Emissions Inventory-Mediterranean Sea. Final Report.
ENVIRON International Corporation (2008). Port of Oakland 2005 Seaport Air Emissions Inventory. Air Sciences.
[9] Friedrich, Heinen, F., Kamakate, F. and Kodjak, D. (2007). Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ocean-going Ships. The International Council on Clean Transportation.
[10] Gupta, A. K., Patil, R. S. and Gupta, S. K. (2002). Emissions of Gaseous and Particulate Pollutants in a Port and Harbour Region in India. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 80: 187-205.
[11] Poirier, M. B. (2007). Inventory and Literature Review of Mobile Source Air Toxics in the Rochester Metropolitan Statistical Region. Center for Environmental Data.
[12] Saxe, H. and Larsen, T. (2004). Air pollution from ships in 3 Danish Ports. Elsevier Ltd. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 38, Issue 24, Pg. 4057-4067.
[13] Stern, A. C., Boubel, R. W., Turner, D. B. and Fox, D. L. (1984). Fundamentals of Air Pollution. Academic Press, Inc. 2nd Edition.
[14]U.S. EPA (1999). National Emission Inventory Documentation and Information. Final Version 3.